Skip to content

Cautious approach should backfire

Liberal leader Christy Clark has taken a fair amount of criticism recently over her decision not to participate in an all candidate’s debate in the Vancouver - Point Grey riding she hopes to win in an upcoming by election.

She comes by the criticism fairly. Clark has a history as a journalist for lambasting politicians who ducked out of opportunities to have questions asked of htem in public. At least five debate opportunities have been made available to her prior to the May 11 by election that she has not responded to.

In the meantime, her most prominent  opponent, NDP candidate David Elby, has accepted them all.

It’s a strategy that worked in the recent federal election with Conservative leader Stephen Harper, but it is a poor example of democratic politics.

It’s doubtful that Clark has anything to fear by participating in the debates. Early polls already favour her to win. She is a capable politician under fire. These are other reasons why her position is unjustified.

Like Harper and his “safe” campaign - Clark will probably survive the negative rhetoric regarding her lack of participation in public discourse. Clark and the party have more than likely done their homework on the issue - the decision was likely  based on a savvy knowledge of the electorate.

It’s a cautious, safe  and cozy approach for Clark to take. Even so, it would be nice if the voters provided a much needed  lesson to the candidate - as well as putting a positive step forward for the democratic process - if the voters of Vancouver - Point Grey surprised us all on May 11.

 



About the Author: Staff Writer

Read more